
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I think you&#8217;ve got your fees mixed up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://loteriachicana.net/2009/11/23/i-think-youve-got-your-fees-mixed-up/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://loteriachicana.net/2009/11/23/i-think-youve-got-your-fees-mixed-up</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:14:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Belinda Gomez</title>
		<link>http://loteriachicana.net/2009/11/23/i-think-youve-got-your-fees-mixed-up/comment-page-1#comment-74382</link>
		<dc:creator>Belinda Gomez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loteriachicana.net/?p=1296#comment-74382</guid>
		<description>California makes it too easy to become a state resident. California also takes a large number of unqualified students who clog up the introductory classes, and then, drop out, having wasted their time and the state&#039;s money. 
And a gym is one thing, but a Pilates studio is a small facility, for only a few, with very expensive equipment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>California makes it too easy to become a state resident. California also takes a large number of unqualified students who clog up the introductory classes, and then, drop out, having wasted their time and the state&#8217;s money.<br />
And a gym is one thing, but a Pilates studio is a small facility, for only a few, with very expensive equipment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HP's conscience</title>
		<link>http://loteriachicana.net/2009/11/23/i-think-youve-got-your-fees-mixed-up/comment-page-1#comment-74356</link>
		<dc:creator>HP's conscience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 00:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loteriachicana.net/?p=1296#comment-74356</guid>
		<description>Hispanic Pundit (Alfonso Trujillo), your screed was damn unreadable and made no sense. Write about undergraduate studies once you&#039;ve had a real experience at a real college, not Devry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hispanic Pundit (Alfonso Trujillo), your screed was damn unreadable and made no sense. Write about undergraduate studies once you&#8217;ve had a real experience at a real college, not Devry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Emery</title>
		<link>http://loteriachicana.net/2009/11/23/i-think-youve-got-your-fees-mixed-up/comment-page-1#comment-74334</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Emery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 22:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loteriachicana.net/?p=1296#comment-74334</guid>
		<description>I think your comparison of UCLA, University of Michigan, and University of Virginia was a little disingenuous.  Each is the flagship research institution in a state with a dramatically smaller population than California. You could have selected Michigan State or Virginia Tech, which are more strictly comparable R1 institutions. Michigan is a lot closer to Berkeley than UCLA in terms of institutional profile.

Low population states almost always have higher proportions of out of state residents. Here in Oklahoma we have a fair proportion of out of state students (because Texans and Californians come to school here), but to suggest that represents a failure to serve the residents of the state is at least a little misleading.

We&#039;re on the same side of the argument and I agree that most citizens have very few clues about how higher ed. is financed. I&#039;d just rather see you support the argument in a different way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your comparison of UCLA, University of Michigan, and University of Virginia was a little disingenuous.  Each is the flagship research institution in a state with a dramatically smaller population than California. You could have selected Michigan State or Virginia Tech, which are more strictly comparable R1 institutions. Michigan is a lot closer to Berkeley than UCLA in terms of institutional profile.</p>
<p>Low population states almost always have higher proportions of out of state residents. Here in Oklahoma we have a fair proportion of out of state students (because Texans and Californians come to school here), but to suggest that represents a failure to serve the residents of the state is at least a little misleading.</p>
<p>We&#8217;re on the same side of the argument and I agree that most citizens have very few clues about how higher ed. is financed. I&#8217;d just rather see you support the argument in a different way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

